How coronavirus is impacting China’s central role in the global supply chain

Much has been written on the coronavirus but very little is still known about its impact on the economy and, in particular the global value chain. Still, one thing is clear: the shock is bigger than SARS for the simple reason that China is much more important for the global economy than it was then. Beyond China’s much larger economic size, it is important to note that China is now much more integrated in the global value chain. By moving up the ladder, China has become a much more important player in exporting intermediate goods than before, which means that any disruption in China’s production capacity could affect the rest of the world more severely than in the past.

It is worth noting that this transformation is asymmetric in nature as China has been reducing its reliance on foreign inputs while it has continuously increased its exports of intermediate goods. This implies that any disruption to China’s value chain reverberates globally as factories elsewhere become more dependent on the intermediated goods imported from China. Given the current disruption to China’s supply chain onshore – total quarantine in Hubei and limited elsewhere – the high dependency on Chinese capital and intermediate goods means that the ability to substitute imports from China for others is rather limited, at least in the short run. 

Beyond the exports of intermediaries, some countries have become very dependent on China as their own companies have moved a good part of their production to China. In other words, the large stock of foreign direct investment (FDI) that developed economies have accumulated in China also explains why the coronavirus is an important global shock. This is especially true for Japan, Korea and Taiwan and, interestingly, it goes beyond their production in China. The reason is simple: while these three economies have been diversifying their FDI away from China into South East Asia, the reality is that South East Asia is also heavily dependent on China for the value chain. In other words, the economic impact of the coronavirus may well show that the degree of diversification achieved by Japan,  Korea and Taiwan with their nearshoring away from China into South East Asia has been rather limited. 

All in all, the coronavirus is putting the well established model of integrated supply chains of production to a test. This is because China has become too central to the global value chain and too important and the shock has actually hit there, at the epicentre. A very likely consequence of this will be a much faster reshoring of the value chain to other destinations. Destinations will be chosen on the basis of many factors but the coronavirus is clearly adding two. First, there should not be as much concentration of the supply chain as there was for China in the past. Second, economies which are too dependent on China’s sourcing will be discouraged. This is clearly good news for countries like Mexico, but also Eastern Europe.


Planning for 100 years: a serious matter of intercultural differences

Recently, a colleague asked me for some of my...

Guyana’s Trade Prospects: A column by Jerry Haar and Cristina Caus.

By Jerry Haar and Cristina Caus * A cursory view...

Bureaucracy—Latin America’s Enduring Nemesis. A column by Jerry Haar.

The mid-year status of Latin America, both economically and...